
I am a big fan of the autumn start of term. I still retain a childish excitement over a new pencil case (bought for my granddaughter) although I had to look long and hard for the precise new school bag that she craved.
Since I became a Vice-Chancellor, my personal start of term is now marked by the annual Universities UK conference. I stay in student halls, eat in the student dining room and meet friends, old and new, asking how their summer went – well really how confirmation and clearing went – and how things look for the upcoming year.
This year’s UUK conference saw an unprecedented three Ministers speak, as well as discussions and presentations by the new Chair of the Office for Students, Sir Edward Peck, and the new Chair of UKRI, Ian Chapman, with turns from Research England’s lead, Dame Jessica Corner. Although at least two of those ministers (Jacqui Smith and Peter Kyle) have new or expanded roles in government, I wanted to reflect on what I heard and what this means for the University of Bristol.
As a number of commentators have pointed out, there was a constant stream of warm words: we heard how Higher Education is a force for good, providing individual opportunity and contributing to UK economic growth and global success. There were references to the stable research funding that was hard won in the last budget and a nod to a post-16 skills White Paper that has been forthcoming since last spring. The Science Minister, Patrick Vallance, did take the time to stress the importance of the dual funding model and the value of curiosity-driven research. He was also very positive about the key role that Arts, Humanities and Social Sciences play. The Skills Minister Baroness Jacqui Smith thanked us all for the work we do on apprenticeships and skills and twice mentioned her forthcoming visit to the University of Bristol’s new micro-campus later that afternoon.
There were some big announcements: Research Excellence Funding (REF) criteria setting will be paused for three months to finalise some of the more contentious details. The ambition is to make it less bureaucratic and better aligned with government priorities. Peck indicated that the Teaching Excellence Framework (TEF) will expand to cover all 400 plus providers on the Office for Students’ register, be more metrics based, and potentially tied to increased tuition fees with tiered uplifts for those with silver and gold ratings. Every presentation emphasised the need for greater focus and specialisation as well as collaboration between universities.

I couldn’t stay for the whole afternoon on Thursday as I had to meet Baroness Smith at the opening of our Hartcliffe and Withywood micro-campus, so I missed some of the later detail. But I did take away a number of themes. The overall emphasis was on showing students, parents and taxpayers that we are spending scarce public resources wisely, supporting economic growth, skills and spinouts. Ministers want to see greater connectivity with industry, and with other parts of the tertiary education system to support employment and productivity.
So, what does this mean for us at the University of Bristol? At some level, I could argue, very little. Our values will continue to guide us. Even if REF rules change, we will still work to improve our own research culture, with an emphasis on reproducibility, open research and research integrity. Whatever happens with TEF, we want all our students to be even more successful in and outside the classroom. We have always been committed to working with under-served communities and we can be proud of our skilled graduates, and innovative spinouts. Jacqui Smith’s visit to our micro-campus and our delivery of Isambard-AI in record time are only two of many examples we can point to as evidence for our deep connectivity with the city-region and beyond.
But it isn’t enough to pat ourselves on the back, and we can’t ignore the broader external environment that was under scrutiny at the UUK conference. While we think we are doing everything we can to support creative, cutting-edge research, innovative education and civic engagement, we can’t take it for granted that everyone agrees. Yes, we can tell our story better, but we also need to make a direct, tangible difference to people’s lives every day, whether that is in terms of their health, sustainability, culture or the economic climate. Moreover, the continued silence on Higher Education funding reform suggests that we will have to look to our own resources and not to government for help. Even more seriously, we need to recognise that, as a sector, universities can no longer assume broad scale support from a voting public that is increasingly polarised and split. This is sobering stuff.
However, as the term starts, I take heart from the amazing staff and students who do deliver remarkable things in and for Bristol every day. I am inspired by the partnerships that we have developed across the city-region, the country and globally. Every time things feel a bit bleak, I remind myself that we have survived and thrived for almost 150 years and look forward to celebrating our anniversary next September. As we move down from Clifton into the heart of the City and out to Mumbai, we will have a chance to really show the world what we can do – I am excited, and I hope you will be too.